On the record
Who may operate
A hair transplant is surgery, and in the UK surgery for cosmetic purposes is a regulated activity by name. Four registers say who may carry it out, and all four are public.
Read the register →England · Scotland · Wales · N. IrelandDocuments read 24 September 2026
The UK rules on hair loss
Almost every question a UK reader has about hair loss has already been answered in writing by somebody with no product to sell — in a statutory instrument, on a regulator's register, on a medicine licence, or in an advertising ruling. This site collects those answers, quotes them, dates them, and says who published them. It names no clinic, ranks no surgeon, and has had no clinician read it.
On the record
A hair transplant is surgery, and in the UK surgery for cosmetic purposes is a regulated activity by name. Four registers say who may carry it out, and all four are public.
Read the register →On the record
Two hair-loss medicines hold UK licences, and their licences say plainly what they are for and who may hand them over. One is general sale; one needs a prescription.
Read the licences →Not on the record
There is one published UK price range and no neutral UK source for a price per graft. So this site prints the range, names its publisher, and leaves the rest blank.
Why the gap stays →No minoxidil tablet holds a UK licence for hair loss. The tablets that exist here are licensed for severe hypertension, and their own labels explain why a prescriber treats them carefully.
23 Sept 2026 →09It is prescription only here, the pack now carries a patient card, and the MHRA tightened the wording again in May 2026. What that means for the three ways a UK reader can be prescribed it.
22 Sept 2026 →08A registered clinic does not imply a registered surgeon, and the UK's list of recognised medical specialties does not contain hair restoration surgery. What the registers can and cannot settle.
21 Sept 2026 →07The check takes a minute, costs nothing, and settles a question nothing else can settle from outside a consulting room. Here is what it proves, what it does not, and how the four nations differ.
20 Sept 2026 →06The comparison people make is about price. The comparison that changes outcomes is about who has power over the clinic once you are home, and what the FCDO says it can and cannot do for you.
19 Sept 2026 →05One official range exists, it spans thirty-fold, and no neutral UK source narrows it. Here is why the band is that wide, what actually moves a quote, and how to read one line by line.
18 Sept 2026 →Because the rules are the part of this subject that is actually settled, and the part almost nobody reads. Whether a given treatment will work for a given head is genuinely uncertain and heavily argued over. Whether a clinic has to be registered before it operates on you is not uncertain at all — it is written down, it is free to check, and it disqualifies people.
The same is true of the medicines. What a UK product is licensed to be used for, and who may lawfully hand it to you, is printed on a document anyone can open. It does not tell you whether to take anything. It does tell you, exactly, what you are looking at.
Who is allowed to operate on you. Surgery for cosmetic purposes using instruments inserted into the body is a regulated activity in UK law. Four registers — one per nation — record who may carry it out, and the doctor sits on a fifth. That is hair transplants in the UK.
What is licensed here, and at what distance from a shop shelf. One hair-loss topical is on general sale; one tablet is prescription only; one tablet is prescription only and licensed for another illness entirely. That is hair loss treatment in the UK.
What an advert is permitted to tell you. Prescription-only medicines may not be advertised to the public here, which explains most of the vagueness you will meet while shopping. The Record works through that and nine other documents.
Every number is a quotation. If a figure appears on this site, a named publisher printed it and the date it was read is recorded. Where no neutral publisher has printed a number — a price per graft, for instance — the gap stays visible rather than being filled from a clinic's advertising.
No clinic, chain or surgeon is named, ranked, scored or linked. A ranking would be a comparison nobody here has made, and the registers already do the only comparison that can honestly be made from outside a consulting room.
No dose, ever. Not a milligram, not a frequency, not a "how to use it". Those belong to the label in the box and the prescriber who wrote it, and a website that supplies them is impersonating somebody who knows your history.
If you are weighing surgery, start with the register for your nation, then the doctor's register, then the fortnight the Care Quality Commission recommends before deciding. If you are weighing a medicine, start with a free GP appointment, because several kinds of hair loss are not pattern baldness and the products sold for pattern baldness are not the answer to any of them.
If you are simply trying to work out what a UK advert is really saying, the Record is where each document is read out loud.